<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Engineering on Ilscipio - Enterprise Commerce Experts</title>
    <link>https://www.ilscipio.com/en/categories/engineering/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Engineering on Ilscipio - Enterprise Commerce Experts</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.ilscipio.com/en/categories/engineering/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Local AI vs. Cloud APIs - When Each One Makes Sense</title>
      <link>https://www.ilscipio.com/en/blog/local-ai-vs-cloud-apis/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ilscipio.com/en/blog/local-ai-vs-cloud-apis/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I run local models on my own hardware for some tasks and cloud APIs for others. People ask which one is better as if it is a philosophical question. It is not. It is a cost and latency question, and the answer depends on what you are doing.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;when-local-makes-sense&#34;&gt;When local makes sense&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you have a task that runs thousands of times a day with short inputs and predictable outputs - classification, extraction, simple Q&amp;amp;A - a local model is cheaper. You pay for the hardware once (or rent a dedicated GPU) and run as many requests as you want. No per-token billing, no rate limits, no dependency on someone else&amp;rsquo;s uptime.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We Rebuilt ilscipio.com From Scratch and Nobody Noticed</title>
      <link>https://www.ilscipio.com/en/blog/new-ilscipio-website/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.ilscipio.com/en/blog/new-ilscipio-website/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Our company website ran on WordPress with the Divi theme for years. It worked. Pages loaded, the contact form sent emails, the blog had posts. But every time I opened PageSpeed Insights the numbers made me wince. CLS of 0.81. A page weight that had no business being that large for what was mostly text and a few images.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;So we tore it down and rebuilt it with &lt;a href=&#34;https://getkronk.com/?utm_source=blog&amp;amp;utm_medium=article&amp;amp;utm_campaign=new-website&#34;&gt;Kronk CMS&lt;/a&gt; running Hugo underneath.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
